Interdisciplinary Collaboration
Nursing meets Technology
Collaboration
Collaboration between
nursing and technology disciplines plays a critical role in refining Clinical DecisionSupport Systems (CDSS) and using of mobile applications. The nursing
perspective was aligned with the patient’s current practice and real-time
situations. The outcomes have the capability to be user-friendly and evidence-based
(Dodson & Layman, 2023). Their interdisciplinary approach
between nursing and computer science led to a mobile CDSS that was user-friendly
and clinically relevant, bridging the gap between pharmacogenetics and everyday
prescribing.
Through the use of
developers, the healthcare and patients can collaborate and create a user-friendly,
safe patient outcome allowing for a unified system. In order for healthcare to
feel comfortable with the use of CDSS, it must be functional and align with understanding,
workflow, and professional values (Ackerhans et al., 2024). Involving users while
developing apps and receiving constructive feedback identifies barriers and encourages
broader use of CDSS in practice.
In the article, “Key Issues for Stakeholder Engagement in the Development of Health and Healthcare Guidelines” (Petkovic et al., 2023) six areas to enhance stakeholder involvement in guideline development to outline plans and develop stakeholder engagement:
Case
Study: Interdisciplinary Design and Implementation of a Clinical Decision
Support System for ADHD in Primary Care
Setting: A
suburban primary care clinic (Willowbrook Family Health) serving a growing
population of school-aged children with behavioral and academic concerns
Challenge: Accurate and timely
identification of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children,
which is often delayed due to inconsistent screening, lack of school
coordination, and limited behavioral health integration.
Solution: Develop
and implement an interdisciplinary Clinical Decision Support (CDS) system to
improve ADHD screening, diagnosis, and follow-up care through a structured,
collaborative workflow.
Interdisciplinary Team:
· Nurse Practitioners (NPs): Conduct initial assessments, use the CDS tools, and lead care coordination.
Behavioral Health Specialist (LCSW): Evaluate psychosocial factors and provide therapy referrals.
- School Nurse (RN):
Ensure adherence to medications daily.
- Academic Teacher:
Inform of effectiveness of medications while at school
- Clinical Informaticist (RN-BC): Lead CDS design and ensure seamless EHR integration.
- Child Psychiatrist (Consultant): Provide guidance on diagnostic criteria and treatment
planning.
- School Liaison (Educational Psychologist): Facilitate communication with educators and interpret
teacher-reported assessments.
- Care Coordinator (RN): Monitor follow-up appointments, track treatment
adherence, and manage communication.
- Parent Advocate:
Ensure that caregiver perspectives are incorporated into CDS design and
family education materials.
CDS
System Design and Implementation:
- Needs Assessment:
Conducted a thorough review of workflow inefficiencies and delays in ADHD diagnosis. Identified gaps in school-provider communication, underuse of screening tools, and inconsistent follow-up care. - Data Elements:
Identified essential inputs for CDS functionality: - Parent- and teacher-completed Vanderbilt ADHD Rating
Scales
- EHR data on behavioral concerns, academic issues, and
family history
- Risk indicators for differential diagnoses (e.g.,
trauma, anxiety)
- Algorithm Development:
Developed a tailored CDS algorithm aligned with AAP ADHD guidelines. The system: - Flags patients with repeated behavioral concerns
- Automatically generates and tracks Vanderbilt forms
- Suggests next steps based on score thresholds
- Prompts re-evaluation and medication monitoring
timelines
- EHR Integration:
Integrated the CDS into the existing EHR, enabling automatic form generation, data tracking, and alerts for follow-up, medication side effects, and treatment milestones. - Training and Education:
Conducted clinic-wide training on ADHD criteria, CDS usage, school collaboration protocols, and shared decision-making strategies. Co-developed family-facing education materials with input from the parent advocate.
Evaluation:
- Process Measures:
- Time from initial concern to diagnosis
- Completion rates of Vanderbilt forms
- Follow-up visit compliance
- Adherence to ADHD guideline-based care
- Outcome Measures:
- Functional improvement in patients (school, home,
behavior)
- Reduction in inappropriate stimulant prescribing
- Parent and teacher satisfaction with care coordination
- User Feedback:
- Clinicians reported improved confidence and reduced
cognitive load
- Families felt more engaged in the decision-making
process
- Teachers noted more timely interventions and clearer
communication (Fiks et al., 2021)
Results:
- Improved ADHD Identification:
The CDS system significantly reduced the time to diagnosis (from 4.5 weeks to 2.7 weeks), with increased use of standardized assessments. - Enhanced Interdisciplinary Communication:
Collaboration between primary care, behavioral health, and schools improved clarity and continuity of care. - Better Follow-Up and Medication Monitoring:
Follow-up compliance rose from 52% to 88%, and alerts helped identify and manage side effects early. - Increased Clinician and Parent Satisfaction:
Providers appreciated the guidance and workflow efficiency, while parents valued inclusion and transparency.
Conclusion:
The implementation of an
ADHD-focused CDS system through interdisciplinary collaboration improved
diagnostic accuracy, communication with families and schools, and overall
workflow in primary care. This case highlights the critical role of team-based
design, data-driven decision-making, and shared accountability in developing
effective CDS strategies for complex pediatric conditions.
References:
Ackerhans S, Huynh T,
Kaiser C, Schultz C. (2024). Exploring the role of professional identity in the
implementation of clinical decision support systems-a narrative review. Implement
Sci. 12;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01339-x.
Dodson, C., & Layman, L. (2023). Interdisciplinary
collaboration among nursing and computer science to refine a pharmacogenetics
clinical decision support tool via mobile application. Computers,
Informatics, Nursing, 41(10), 577–583. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000959
Fiks, A. G., Mayne, S. L., McCarn, B., Power, T. J., Guevara, J. P., & Jimenez, M. E. (2021). Improving care management in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics, 148(2), e2020031518. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-031518
Petkovic J, Magwood O, Lytvyn L, Khabsa J, Concannon TW, Welch V, Todhunter-Brown A, Palm ME, Akl EA, Mbuagbaw L, Arayssi T, Avey MT, Marusic A, Morley R, Saginur M, Slingers N, Texeira L, Ben Brahem A, Bhaumik S, Bou Akl I, Crowe S, Dormer L, Ekanem C, Lang E, Kianzad B, Kuchenmüller T, Moja L, Pottie K, Schünemann H, Tugwell P.(2023).Key issues for stakeholder engagement in the development of health and healthcare guidelines. Res Involv Engagem;9(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00433-6.
Robertson ST, Rosbergen
ICM, Burton-Jones A, Grimley RS, Brauer SG. The Effect of the Electronic Health
Record on Interprofessional Practice: A Systematic Review. Appl Clin Inform.
2022 May;13(3):541-559. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1748855.
Comments
Post a Comment